ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy and Safety Study of Darunavir for the Treatment of HIV/AIDS
The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of Darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily (DRV/r) monotherapy as a switch-maintenance strategy for patients receiving second-line ART at Yaoundé Central Hospital in Cameroon. HIV-infected adults receiving second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for ≥3 months with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) will undergo plasma HIV-1 RNA ("viral") load testing. Those with a viral load below 50 copies/ml (\<50 cps/ml) will undergo a repeat test ideally 4-6 weeks later (allowed up to 12 weeks); if the viral load is confirmed as \<50 cps/ml the patient will be invited to join the randomised phase of the study. Patients (n=150) will be randomised 1:2 to either continue the current triple ART regimen (n=50) or switch to DRV/r monotherapy (n=100). The primary end-point will be viral load suppression \<400 cps/ml at week 24; secondary end-points will be viral load suppression \<50 cps/ml at week 12 and week 24, safety, tolerability, and emergence of protease inhibitor (PI) drug-resistance. Patients will continue observational follow-up depending on the treatment arm they are randomized to. After week 48, patients will return to local standard of care. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacogenomics sub-study to correlate plasma concentrations of DRV to outcomes, HIV-1 drug resistance testing sub study to detect mutants archived at the time of first-line ART failure and measuring HIV DNA load will be performed, as well as a cost-effectiveness analysis will test the hypothesis that savings can be achieved by switching to DRV/r monotherapy without affecting quality of care. The primary virological objective is to evaluate efficacy in terms of the percentage of subjects who have plasma HIV-1 RNA levels \<400 cps/ml after 24 weeks of follow-up following a switch to DRV/r monotherapy versus continuing triple therapy conta
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Phase 2B Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Trial Of UK-453,061 Versus Etravirine In Combination With Darunavir/Ritonavir And A Nucleos(t)Ide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor For The Treatment Of Antiretroviral Experienced HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Evidence Of NNRTI Resistant HIV-1#827529
- Study of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Tablets Comparing Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Administration When Coadministered With Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-Experienced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Subjects#1322891
- Standard Antiretroviral v. Multi-class Therapy in Acutely HIV-1 Infected Antiretroviral-Naïve Subjects (ADARC 2007-01)#1058414
- Safety Tolerability DDI Short Course Treatment of LTBI Infection With High-dose Rifapentine and Isoniazid or Standard Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in HIV+ Patients (DOLPHIN & DOLPHIN TOO)#900053
- Oral ISL QM as PrEP in Cisgender Women at High Risk for HIV-1 Infection (MK-8591-022)#1362519
Record · ID 1261554
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive