ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Versus Plasma Exchange (PE) for Ventilated Children With Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Comparing whether intravenous immune globulin or plasma exchange is superior in treating mechanically ventilated children with Guillain Barre syndrome.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Immunoadsorption and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre Syndrome#966779
- A narrative review of considerations when assessing potential relationships between Guillain-Barré syndrome and vaccines#4575
- Living With Guillain-Barré Syndrome as Children.#1102803
- COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Reduces Guillain-Barre Syndrome Risk: Evidence from a Large Longitudinal Cohort Study#424117
- Treatment of Multiple System Atrophy Using Intravenous Immunoglobulins#884910
Record · ID 1262183
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive