ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of CTG and T-PRF on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue
The present study aimed to increase the thickness of the gingiva and prevent possible crestal bone resorption by placing the CTG or T-PRF membrane under the mucosa immediately after the implant treatment in individuals with thin gingival phenotype. The null hypothesis was that T-PRF used simultaneously with implant placement can be considered an alternative to CTG.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- L-PRF for Increasing Keratinised Mucosa Around Implants#876543
- Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Adjunctive Application of Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF)#911635
- Autogenous Sticky Bone Plus Platelet-rich Fibrin Membrane Versus Xenograft With Collagen Membrane for Posterior Atrophic Mandible#1243412
- The Effect of Platelet Rich Fibrin Layers on Peri-implant Tissue Phenotype#1103519
- Soft Tissue Evaluation Around Implants Using Prf or a Palatal Pedicle#1032166
Record · ID 1262837
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive