CanLII
metadata only
Lali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Decided: 2026-10-09. Docket: IMM-8913-25. Citation: 2026 FC 1245 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Procedural fairness — Whether redetermination was de novo and independent — Reasons largely copied from prior refusal decision — Failure to meaningfully address updated submissions and evidence — Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General) cited — Judicial review granted, decision set aside and remitted for redetermination by different officer | Administrative law — Decision making — Impartiality and independence — Whether extensive copying rebuts presumption decision maker turned mind to issues — Cojocaru v British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre applied — Near verbatim replication of analysis across central decision points — Reasonable person test
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Asghar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1347090
- Barco Asprilla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1251751
- Ibarra Sandi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1347094
- Garg v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1266813
- 2206747 Ontario Limited v. Webb#1236050
Record · ID 1266809
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive