OpenMETU
metadata only
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
DISARMING THE DEFENSES: A SERIOUS GAME INTERVENTION TO REDUCE MEAT-EATING JUSTIFICATIONS AND SPECIESISM IN TURKISH AND UK SAMPLES
The discrepancy between opposing animal suffering and continuing to consume animal products is known as the meat paradox. At the individual level, this contrast is maintained by psychological defenses such as various strategies and cognitions.The current dissertation developed and evaluated a seriou
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Self-control strategies to reduce meat consumption: An ecological momentary intervention.#1097752
- Quantifying the Relationship Between Key Potential Environmental and Nutritional Health Benefits of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives and Their Price Premiums Compared to Beef#273387
- Veganism#750930
- Consumer Choice and Collective Impact#756453
- Soylent Green 2.0?” A Qualitative Analysis of Online Comments on Cultivated Meat in Germany and the Netherlands#127132
Record · ID 1267745
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive