OSF
open access
Is Guessing to Blame? Comparing Two Accounts of Attenuated Monitoring Accuracy in Recognition-Based Metamemory Judgments
The relative accuracy of prospective metamemory monitoring is typically assessed through the association between judgments of learning (JOLs) and subsequent memory performance. In recognition paradigms, however, manifest correlations can vary across task structures, and prior work insinuated that su
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Guessing to Blame? Comparing Two Accounts of Attenuated Monitoring Accuracy in Recognition-Based Metamemory Judgments#1272036
- Perceptual sensitivity, but not metacognitive monitoring, is shaped by increases and decreases in control.#148162
- Making Judgments of Learning Increases Restudy Choices: Evidence for Reactivity in Metacognitive Control.#409207
- PERMEPSY: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind proof-of-concept trial of personalized metacognitive training for adults with psychosis - a study protocol.#888
- Metacognitive expression activates attention networks and increases episodic recall detail during naturalistic film viewing#168459
Record · ID 1267855
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive