PsyArXiv
metadata only
Do bilinguals avoid ambiguity or minimise processing effort? Insights from an online eye-tracking study in spoken Mandarin
Previous research shows that bilinguals tend to choose more explicit referential forms (e.g., overt pronouns over null pronouns) compared to monolingual speakers, but the mechanisms driving this tendency remain debated. By conducting two experiments examining lexical ambiguity in spoken Mandarin, we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The processing of multi-word expressions in L1 and L2 Chinese: Evidence from reaction times and eye movements#344093
- Do bilinguals avoid ambiguity or minimise processing effort? Insights from an online eye-tracking study in spoken Mandarin#1267882
- Cognitive Mechanisms of Referential Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Russian by Chinese Learners: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.#315522
- Large language models infer hidden preferences from eye movements but fail to exploit response times#372306
- Types of Dialogue and Pragmatic Ambiguity#750251
Record · ID 1272033
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive