PhilArchive
open access
A Neglected Argument of Hutcheson’s on Moral Motivation
In a brief passage in the first two editions of his Inquiry, Hutcheson gives an argument that has been little noticed in the literature against the view that what motivates us to act morally is the prospect of taking pleasure in our evaluation of ourselves as moral. I reconstruct Hutcheson’s argument and show how it differs from a similar argument from Butler and Hume. I also show that Hutcheson’s argument is inconsistent with another important view of his. In the third and fourth editions of the Inquiry, Hutcheson omits the argument. I speculate that the reason for this was that he became aware that his argument was inconsistent with that other view of his.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hutcheson and his Critics and Opponents on the Moral Sense#699042
- Francis Hutcheson and John Clarke: Self-Interest, Desire, and Divine Impassibility#773022
- Review of Roger Crisp, _The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick's_ Methods of Ethics#768516
- Moral Motivation and the Externalist Challenge#767350
- Hume’s Passion-Based Account of Moral Responsibility#77543
Record · ID 127260
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive