Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
A Note on Why Quarter of Birth is Not a Valid Instrument for Educational Attainment
In their justification for using entrance cutoff dates and compulsory education laws as a natural experiment, the authors of Angrist and Krueger (1991) rightly give much attention to the effectiveness of compulsory attendance laws. However, the authors do not give proper attention to the decisions m
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Paying for Attendance: Using Incentives to Combat Chronic Absenteeism#1148559
- Ten Simple Rules for Inclusively Supporting Attendance and Engagement in Higher Education#270365
- Selective Factors Impacting Charter High School Enrollment#664422
- Stories from Former Foster Youth College Graduates: The Positive Impact of K-12 Schooling and Related Educational Policy#331563
- Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?#21339
Record · ID 1276281
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive