Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
Economic Rationale For Extending Protection To Smell Marks
In the traditional view of trademark law, a trademark serves its brand-identifying function. Consequently, marks which consumers actually use to identify the source of a product were allowed protection. James Hawes was the first commentator to assert that product scent merits trademark protection. T
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Translating promotional and advertising texts#207533
- Preempting Pre-Approval: Clarifying Preemption Doctrine for Product-Liability Suits Against Brand-Name Drug Manufacturers#477429
- Stabilizing Morality in Trademark Law#272557
- Property Rights and Intrabrand Restraints#1148971
- 15 U.S.C. § 1065 — Incontestability of right to use mark under certain conditions#567926
Record · ID 1276507
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive