Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
The Coase Theorem, Private Information, and the Benefits of Not Assigning Property Rights
Using a simple bilateral trading example with discrete valuations and costs it is demonstrated that in the presence of private information the efficiency of Coasean bargaining may be strictly enhanced if initially no property rights are assigned.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Optimal auctions with simultaneous and costly participation#934696
- SovereignNegotiation-Bench: Evaluating User-Owned Personal Agents In Delegated Bargaining Under Privacy, Consent, Evidence, And Institutional Pressure#1186504
- Large-Market Discipline in Combinatorial Double Auctions: No Assembly, Bundle Selection, and Complementarities#615150
- Large-Market Discipline in Combinatorial Double Auctions: No Assembly, Bundle Selection, and Complementarities#614183
- Simple “Market Value” Bargaining Model for Weighted Voting Games: Characterization and Limit Theorems#942107
Record · ID 1277246
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive