Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
Universal Basic Income and Negative Income Tax: Two Different Ways of Thinking Redistribution
This article examines two redistributive policies: Negative Income Tax and Universal Basic Income. Its aim is to show that, although the two achieve the same distributive outcome through an appropriate tax-benefit system, they are fundamentally different from economic and ethical points of view. The
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Universal Basic Income and Negative Income Tax: Two Different Ways of Thinking Redistribution#1274795
- The Purpose and Balance of Taxation in Human Society: A Universal Law of Balance Perspective#115242
- Tax Ethics#85310
- When to mix it up? : sorting, inequality, and re-distributive taxation#207701
- Das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen im Lichte von Michael Walzers Theorie der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit#745629
Record · ID 1277305
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive