Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
Firm Value and the mis-use of the CAPM for valuation and decision making
This paper shows that a decision maker using the CAPM for valuing firms and making decisions may contradict Modigliani and Miller’s Proposition I, if he adopts the widely-accepted disequilibrium NPV. As a consequence, CAPM-minded agents employing this NPV are open to arbitrage losses and miss arbitr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Firm Value and the mis-use of the CAPM for valuation and decision making#1277383
- Firm Value and the mis-use of the CAPM for valuation and decision making#1277087
- Economic profit, NPV, and CAPM: Biases and violations of Modigliani and Miller's Proposition I#1277497
- Economic profit, NPV, and CAPM: Biases and violations of Modigliani and Miller's Proposition I#1277493
- THEORETICAL FLAWS IN THE USE OF THE CAPM FOR INVESTMENT DECISIONS#1276923
Record · ID 1277351
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive