ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
The primary purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two transvaginal apical suspension strategies for uterovaginal prolapse: a mesh augmented hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). The primary aim is to determine whether treatment success in women who undergo the above strategies differ at time points through 3 years. A supplemental study investigates anterior vaginal wall movement resulting from descent or rotation of the vaginal apex and/or anterior vaginal elongation, in women in both of the study arms of SUPeR.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A New Technique for Sacrospinous-Sacrotuberous Fixation for the Treatment of Uterovaginal and Vaginal Vault Prolapse#1279321
- Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy#847882
- Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment#890817
- The Effect of Different Delivery Positions on Pelvic Floor Function.#871810
- Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.#828408
Record · ID 1279280
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive