ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of SECTG Vs. Laser-DGG in Management of Gingival Recessions.
This study evaluates laser de-epithelialized gingival graft to be as effective as subepithelial connective tissue graft in management of multiple gingival recessions using tunneling technique. half pf participants will be treated from gingival recession using tunneling technique with laser de-epithelized gingival graft, while the other half will be treated using tunneling technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions#1349616
- The Use of Coronary Displaced Flap and Deepithelialized Free Graft in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions#1243580
- The Tunnel Technique and Free Gingival Graft in Gingival Recessions Treatment#805602
- Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Gingival Recession Treatment#844998
- 3D Digital Assessment of Soft Tissue Changes After Modified FGG#887851
Record · ID 1279529
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive