ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Partial Thickness vs Full Thickness Tragal Cartilage Grafts in Endoscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty
Primary Objective: Compare 6-month graft success rates between 0.5 mm sliced and 1.8 mm full-thickness tragal cartilage grafts.(3) H1: Sliced cartilage yields ≥90% success versus ≤80% for full-thickness.(3) H0: No difference between arms. Secondary Objectives: * PTA-ABG closure at 6/12 months.(4) * Speech discrimination score improvement.(4) * Operative time.(6)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cartilage Tympanoplasty for Recurrent Perforation Full Thickness Versus Partial Thickness Graft#1197826
- Autologous Fat Grafting Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Volume Augmentation#893389
- All Autologous Cartilage Regeneration in the Treatment of the Knee Cartilage Defects#1351612
- Reconstruction of Deficient Atrophic Ridges Using Guide Bone Regeneration Technique#1363275
- Spacer Graft Study#875992
Record · ID 1279979
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive