ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut
When using suture (stitches) to close wounds, surgeons can use suture that is absorbable or non-absorbable. Absorbable sutures naturally break down. Non-absorbable sutures need to be removed. We wish to determine how the cosmetic result of a specific absorbable suture (fast absorbing gut) compares to that of a specific non-absorbable suture (prolene).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Analysis of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Section#812405
- Interrupted Versus Continuous Subcuticular Skin Suturing in Elective Cesarean Section.#837882
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Skin Closure With Staples Versus Suture#873454
- Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy#810721
- Dermal Suturing Only Versus Layered Cutaneous Closure#1212868
Record · ID 1281071
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive