ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Air Versus Saline Solution for the Localization of the Epidural Space in Labour Analgesia
Epidural space localization using loss of resistance technique with air (ALOR) is controversial in obstetric analgesia due to a minor efficacy and risk of complications, compared with loss of resistance technique with saline (SLOR). This randomized prospective study will compare the efficacy and incidence of most common complications of both techniques in obstetric analgesia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Loss of Resistance Techniques#1369422
- Incidence and Factors Involving Cesarean Delivery After Epidural Analgesia for Labor#801074
- Influence of Maternal Postioning on Spread of Local Anesthetic After Epidural Analgesia#803029
- Real Time 3D Navigation and Traditional US to Identify Epidural Space Depth in Obese Pregnant#1163368
- Ultrasound Evaluation of Labor Epidural#1369669
Record · ID 1281139
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive