ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Lateral Approach Versus Anterior Approach in Total Ankle Replacement
A minimum of 50 patients with ankle end-stage arthritis will be randomized in two parallel groups for surgery. One group will receive a total ankle replacement through an anterior approach and the other group a total ankle replacement via a lateral approach. Patients will be evaluated for a mean follow-up of two years in terms of complications, implant survival and functional results. One of the primary objectives of the study is analyzing the safety of the lateral and anterior approaches for total ankle replacement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Observational Study of Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Tibiotalar Arthrodesis#1352435
- Surgery for Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Joint Replacement vs. Trapeziectomy#899280
- Gait Analysis and Neuromuscular Function After Primary Total Hip Replacement#1047336
- Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Surgical Treatment of Ankle Arthritis Outcome Study#844430
- 2-Year Post-Approval Study to Investigate the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR) Ankle Under Actual Conditions of Use#1171620
Record · ID 1281822
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive