ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Silk Suture and Tissue Adhesive for Wound Closure After Impacted Tooth
This study was administered to 21 female and 9 male patients. Patients with impacted wisdom teeth on both sides of the mandible were selected. After extraction of the impacted teeth, silk sutures were used on one side and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on the other side for wound closure. The effects of these two materials on patient comfort were investigated.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sutureless Versus Conventional Suturing in Oral Surgery#1230004
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives and Conventional Sutures#885361
- Dermal Wound Closure Using Silkam®#883001
- Suturing vs Biological Adhesive in Simple Lacerations of Hand#1369660
- Evaluating the Efficacy of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) With Four Interrupted Sutures in Adult Male Circumcision#1294041
Record · ID 1281849
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive