ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Natural Cycle Versus Hormone Replacement Therapy Cycle for a Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer in PGT Patients
The aim of the current study is to compare miscarriage rates (before 8 weeks) between a true natural cycle (awaiting spontaneous LH surge) and a hormone replacement therapy cycle prior to blastocyst transfer in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) patients, with biopsy on day 5 of embryonic development. The advantage of performing the study in PGT patients is the exclusion of aneuploidy as a cause of miscarriage.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SHorter Treatment of Replacement Therapy for Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)#896761
- Natural Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) vs Substituted Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)#1198394
- Cumulative Live Birth Rate With eSET After Preimplantation Genetic Screening Versus Conventional In-vitro Fertilization#1245110
- Natural Cycle/Progesterone Fortified Protocol for Endometrial Preparation for Frozen/Thawed Embryo Transfer#907852
- Monitoring of Progesterone Administered in Infertile Patients During a Cycle of Frozen Embryo Transfer.#1260774
Record · ID 1282329
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive