ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Distolingual Infiltration Verses Conventional Nerve Block in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction
This randomized controlled trial will compare the effectiveness of adding distolingual infiltration to conventional inferior alveolar and buccal nerve blocks for mandibular third molar extraction. A total of 120 patients will be allocated into two groups. Pain during flap elevation and bone guttering will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Validation of a Novel Classification for Predicting Surgical Complexity in Mandibular Wisdom Teeth Surgery#807188
- Comparison of Preoperative Analgesics on the Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.#1246215
- Leukocyte- and Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) Application in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal Surgery#862676
- Microbial Growth in the Suture Thread, After Application of Different Antiseptic Gels in Mandibular Third Molars Extraction#995546
- Comparison of the Effects of Protocols Applied After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars#910091
Record · ID 1282676
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive