Figshare
open access
CC BY 4.0
Supplemental material for: Generative artificial intelligence in physiology education: what the evidence shows, with recommendations and warnings for educators
assessmentchatgpteducational-technology-and-computinggenerative-artificial-intelligencehigher-educationlarge-language-models
Supplemental material for a commissioned Staying Current review in Advances in Physiology Education. The files document a structured literature review with critical appraisal of 55 empirical studies (published 30 November 2022 to October 2026) on generative artificial intelligence in ph
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: current status, issues, and prospects#964303
- Generative artificial intelligence in primary care: an online survey of UK general practitioners#292718
- A Meta-synthesis of nursing students' experiences with generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning.#418295
- Nurse educators' experiences and perceptions using generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review.#465053
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84#964357
Record · ID 1283565
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive