PsyArXiv
metadata only
Making good decisions with counterfactuals
Making a good decision often requires knowing something counterfactual: whether a person would be better off if we acted than if we didn't. Formal work shows how both experimental and observational data ought to be combined to inform good decisions. Here, we ask whether people's intuitions follow th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Making good decisions with counterfactuals#1286661
- Causal decision theory, context, and determinism#78554
- Should we be skeptics or contextualists about counterfactual conditionals?#749080
- P$^2$CE: Model-Agnostic Plausible Pareto-Optimal Counterfactual Explanations#1084257
- Cue competition effects and young children's causal and counterfactual inferences#752031
Record · ID 1286606
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive