PsyArXiv
metadata only
More Data, Worse Inference: How the Imputation Model Decides an Interaction Effect
Interaction hypotheses are central to psychology, and predictors are often incomplete. Standard guidance recommends multiple imputation (MI), yet "MI" denotes different procedures once the model contains a product term. We quantify how the imputation model governs recovery of a continuous × continuo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- More Data, Worse Inference: How the Imputation Model Decides an Interaction Effect#1286710
- Flexible Multiple Imputation of Missing Data in Time-Structured Longitudinal Designs#433174
- Flexible Multiple Imputation of Missing Data in Time-Structured Longitudinal Designs#323797
- One-step Outcome Imputation: An Alternative to Multiple Imputation#1069817
- Robust variance estimation for multiple imputation using predictive mean matching or parametric imputation models#1249639
Record · ID 1286641
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive