ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Medial Rectus Fenestration vs Recession for PAET
This prospective comparative study aims to compare medial rectus (MR) muscle fenestration and recession in patients with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The main question it aims to answer is whether MR fenestration is equally effective as MR recession for PAET. All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment. Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups; Group 1 will receive conventional MR recession, and Group 2 will receive MR fenestration.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative#1127000
- Altemeier{'}s procedure for complete rectal prolapse; Outcome and function in 43 consecutive female patients#247063
- Avoiding Surgery in Rectal Cancer After Pre-Operative Therapy#1211365
- Reasons for Non-reversal of Temporary Stomas After Surgeries of Mid-low Rectal Cancer （NORESTO Study）#852252
- Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Delorme's Operation in Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse#847501
Record · ID 1292587
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive