ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Wound Closure (Allgower) Versus Secondary Open Wound Healing After Removal of the External Fixator
In this prospective randomized controlled single-center trial, based on a non-inferiority design, the outcome of the treatment of patients are analyzed, whereas in half of the cases the wounds are left open and the other ones are primary wound closed after local debridement after Fixator-Extern is removed. Although this topic embodies a daily business, there is no standard to be found in literature regarding the treatment of pin sites with closure by either primary or secondary intent.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Secondary Versus Tertiary Wound Closure in High Risk Gynecologic Abdominal Surgical Incisions#992915
- Nursing Care Management of External Fixation in Hospitalization: Pin Site Infection Incidence#1292662
- Closure of Fasciotomy Wounds: A Prospective, Observational Study of a Continuous External Tissue Expander#1007523
- Wound Closure Techniques in Primary Spine Surgery#1182433
- Safety and Efficacy of realSKIN® to Provide Complete Wound Closure of Burn Wounds as an Alternative to Autografting#800976
Record · ID 1294072
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive