ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
The purpose of this study is to compare to the patients undergoing nonintubated general anesthesia with laryngeal mask and undergoing intubated general anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation in Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
- Compare Outcomes of CPR Between the Video-laryngoscopy (VL) Users and the Direct-laryngoscopy (DL) Users#1372962
- Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation#803860
- the Clinicaltrail of the Effection Which of Phrenic Block Using in Non-intubated Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery#1372626
- Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Has Revolutionised Management of Complicated PPE, Our Study to Determine VATS Decortication Technique is Needed, Compared to VATS Debridement in PPE, Also RAPID Score and Pleural US Parameters Can Predict Which VATS Procedure is Needed.#387283
Record · ID 1294201
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive