ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cost-utility of Two Strategies of Perineal Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection for Anorectal Carcinoma
Abdominoperineal resection performed for anorectal tumors leaves a large pelvic and perineal defect causing a high rate of morbidity of the perineal wound (40 - 60 %). Biological meshes offer possibility for a new standard of perineal wound reconstruction. Perineal filling with biological mesh is expected to increase quality of life by reducing perineal morbidity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early Surgical Outcomes in the Use of Hybrid Mesh for Incisional Hernia Repair: Results From a Multicenter Italian Study#1365113
- Peritonectomy procedures for peritoneal surface malignancies: PSOGI-ESGO-ISSPP Lyon consensus#350594
- MEsh FIxation in Laparoendoscopic Repair of Large M3 Inguinal Hernias#869122
- Comparison Using Pericardial Membrane Versus Titanium Mesh" in Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation#895814
- Peristomal Skin Complications in the First 12 Weeks Post-discharge Following Urinary/Fecal Stoma Formation Surgery#824121
Record · ID 1294703
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive