ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
The purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of traditional and digital implant level impression procedures by using three-dimensional superimposition analysis , and evaluate the passive fit of screw- retained implant supported restorations fabricated using conventional and digital impression techniques in bilateral distal extension cases (class I kennedy classification)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Digital Versus Conventional Impression Technique in Mandibular Arch#875932
- Wearable Device to Assess Mobility After Anterior Iliac Grafting Covered With a Regional Block Technique Transversus Abdominis Plane Block#894397
- Comparison of Non-Calibrated Splinting Bodies and T-Marker for Complete-Arch Implant Scanning#864864
- Splint Versus Non-splint Implant Impressions#1322479
- Accuracy of the Emergence Profile of Dental Implant Restorations using different gingival mask techniques.#422996
Record · ID 1295016
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive