ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Laparoscopic Traditional and Knotless Sutures
Background Excess weight and obesity is the fifth leading risk factor for global death. Bariatric surgery is considered as the only effective long-term treatment for morbid obesity. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the best surgical procedures, since it achieves excellent long-term results with a low complication rate. Intestinal anastomosis is a very complex and time-consuming procedure in laparoscopy, mainly due to the difficulties of knotting the suture in a limited working area. Barbed sutures may enhance this procedure by eliminating the need for knot tying. Objective The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of knotless barbed sutures (Stratafix) and continuous sutures (Vicryl) for closing the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomosis in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. Study design This is a prospective randomized study. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: traditional suture group or knotless suture group. Randomization will be realized by sealed envelopes according to a computer-generated sequence of random numbers, which will be opened for the surgeon just before starting the anastomosis. During the surgery the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses will be performed with a stapler (Echelon 45 Endopath) and closed with a traditional (Vicryl) or knotless (Stratafix Unidirectional) suture. The same surgeon, experienced and specialized in laparoscopic gastric bypass technique, will perform all procedures. Study population Two hundred patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Main study parameters/endpoints The primary outcome measure will be the rate of anastomosis-related complications (leakage, bleeding, gastric fistula, anastomotic stenosis) at 4 weeks and at 6 months post-op (safety). The secondary outcome measure will be the time spent on closing the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomosis (efficacy).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Barbed Suture vs Non-Barbed Closure for Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy RCT#1009512
- Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Purse-string Suture Clamp and Multi-functional Seal Cap for Totally Laparoscopic Radical Total Gastrectomy#864192
- Compression Anastomosis Using the CAR™ 27#1185362
- Compression Anastomosis Using the CAR™ 27#838999
- Comparative Ergonomic Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery#1351416
Record · ID 1295121
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive