ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy
This is a noninferiority study designed to examine whether conscious sedation with midazolam alone results in efficacy and safety that is not inferior to the combination of midazolam and fentanyl. English-speaking patients ≥18 years old and ≤75 years old presenting for GI endoscopy planned with conscious sedation using midazolam and fentanyl, will be randomized 1:1 to single agent sedation with midazolam or combination sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Participants will be blinded to the choice of sedation. Sedation quality and adverse events will be measured with a validated patient-centered measure of procedural sedation quality, the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) \[Leffler, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):194-203\]. Endoscopic quality measures in the 2 study groups will be collected by retrospective chart review, as an additional metric to ensure the quality of the procedure is not compromised by the choice of sedation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Narcotrend Versus Bispectral Index Monitoring During Sufentanil-Midazolam Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy#880062
- Clinical Outcomes of Sedation in Cataract Surgery Performed Under Topical Anesthesia#865982
- Intranasal Sedation With Dexmedetomidine#879921
- The Efficacy of Midazolam & Ketamine Versus Midazolam & Fentanyl for Sedation in Ambulatory Colonoscopies#1197040
- Comparison of Remifentanil as a Sole Agent or in Combination With Midazolam Versus Fentanyl/Midazolam During Sedation for Colonoscopy#833024
Record · ID 1295783
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive