ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Long-term Outcomes of Tunnel Technique
Few studies evaluate the outcomes beyond 1 year follow up for gingival recessions treatments using the tunnel technique in combination with connective tissue graft. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the 4-year outcomes of the CAF versus the pouch/tunnel (TUN) technique both associated with CTG.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession#1231386
- The Use of Coronary Displaced Flap and Deepithelialized Free Graft in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions#1243580
- Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft#911798
- Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites#1293850
- Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Gingival Recession Treatment#844998
Record · ID 1296098
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive