arXiv (All)
open access
Implications of Current Litigation on the Design of AI Tools for Healthcare Delivery and Related Legal Frameworks
The medical, legal, and technology communities often center physicians' role in preventing and mitigating harms from medical AI tools. We conduct an analysis of 31 U.S. legal cases and reported harms to identify patterns around how AI tools impact patient care. Our findings reflect how patients' med
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ethical Provisions and Controls of Applying AI in Health Care Practicians#458202
- Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility?#672058
- 3. Legal Considerations of AI-Blockchain in Health#2081
- Evidence Synthesis of the Ethical and Legal Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Patient Health Information.#1373859
- Principles for Responsible AI in Health Professions Education, Research, and Care: Health CARE-AI (Contextual, Accountable, Responsible, and Equitable Artificial Intelligence) Framework Delphi Consensus Study.#402669
Record · ID 1296355
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive