arXiv (All)
open access
What Counts as Evidence? Epistemic Cue Utilization in Large Language Models
Which information actually shapes a language model's judgment when sources disagree? We study epistemic cue utilization through a controlled benchmark of 500 scenarios and five complementary tracks separating cue identification, cue influence, and competition between source, temporal, and presentati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Reasoning Representations Help Humans Evaluate LLM Outputs?#986647
- Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich#755967
- Same Output, Different Gold: Measuring How Reference Choice Moves a Multilingual Benchmark Score#1199099
- Aggregating sets of judgments: Two impossibility results compared#748731
- Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result#748730
Record · ID 1296795
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive