arXiv (All)
open access
Collaborative Theory of Mind: Learning to Self-Revise by Anticipating User Responses
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong individual task performance, yet still struggle to collaborate with users over extended, multi-turn interactions, for example by attempting solutions before understanding the user's needs or by failing to revise mistaken assumptions after receiving fee
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dual-process theory and decision-making in large language models#1078447
- Beyond Trajectory Imitation: Strategy-Guided Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning#1342540
- Selective Deficits in LLM Mental Self-Modeling in a Behavior-Based Test of Theory of Mind#1116237
- Examining Social Attribution in LLM Reasoning: A Theory-Guided Probing Methodology#1249447
- ChatGPT, metacognitive processes and syntactic complexity : an overview of LLMs usage and its impact on writing in the EFL classroom#672488
Record · ID 1296879
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive