arXiv (All)
open access
Can Agents Price a Reaction? Evaluating LLMs on Chemical Cost Reasoning
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable as tool-using agents, with benchmarks spanning diverse general agentic tasks. Yet rigorous evaluation of scientific tool use remains limited. In chemistry, recent agents can plan syntheses and invoke domain-specific tools, but evaluations
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TSBench: A physics-grounded benchmark for evaluating LLM understanding of chemical reaction mechanisms#985853
- A Production-Grade, High-Efficiency Agentic RL Framework for Frontier LLMs with Validated Recipes#1327942
- ARMOR: An Agentic Framework for Reaction Feasibility Prediction via Adaptive Utility-aware Multi-tool Reasoning#1129246
- Autonomous Chemical Mechanistic Discovery through Agentic Reasoning and Validation#998699
- ACED-Bench: Evaluating How LLM Agents Acquire and Act on Causal Evidence#1325277
Record · ID 1297120
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive