arXiv (All)
open access
Let Large Language Models Judge Each Other: Multi-Agent Peer-Reviewed Reasoning for Medical Question Answering
Objective: To enhance the accuracy, interpretability, and robustness of large language models (LLMs) in medical question answering (MedQA). Method: We designed a multi-agent peer-reviewed reasoning method in which multiple LLM agents independently generate chain-of-thought reasoning with candidate
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adaptive Memory and Reflection Multi-Agent System for Medical Question Answering#467166
- Beyond Downstream QA: Rethinking How We Evaluate Agent Memory#1357864
- Beyond Downstream QA: Rethinking How We Evaluate Agent Memory#1348856
- BanglaMed-QA: A Question Answering System for Healthcare Support in Bangla#618565
- PAIR: Memory-Efficient and Fast Inference with Reading--Reasoning Fusion#1327593
Record · ID 1297173
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive