arXiv (All)
open access
Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?
Automated failure attribution uses LLMs to identify where and why agentic systems fail. As agents become more capable, their failures become subtler, making automated attribution increasingly important. We introduce Who&When Pro, a large-scale benchmark for automated failure attribution in agentic s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VST: Verifiable Structured Transport for Auditable Agent-to-Agent Alpha Discovery#975129
- Althea: The Fact-Checking--Metalearning Tradeoff in AI-Assisted Verification#1049753
- DCFA: Dual-view Causal-inspired Attribution for Failure Reasoning in LLM-based Multi-agent Systems#971421
- ReCast: Attribution-Oriented Step Representation Learning for LLM-Based Agent Systems#1248614
- Root-Cause Attribution Is a Search Problem: Continual Search for Long-Horizon Agent Failures#1071249
Record · ID 1297197
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive