arXiv (All)
open access
Equality, Equity, and Causality in Fairness Research: A Commentary on Cheng (2026)
This is an invited commentary on the Psychometrika focus article "Fairness Issues and Evaluation in Psychometrics and AI/ML: What Can We Learn from Each Field?" by Ying Cheng (2026, doi:10.1017/psy.2026.10110). Cheng offers a systematic comparison between long-standing test fairness and modern algor
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Role of Uncertainty in Assessing the Fairness of Machine Learning Models#985363
- Explaining Injustice: Structural Analysis, Bias, and Individuals#117890
- Single-Stage Causal Incentive Design via Optimal Interventions.#334920
- Conflict and Deep Persuasion#696170
- Deepfake-induced harm and AI accountability: a layered civil-liability framework for generative models, platforms, and digital identity.#375349
Record · ID 1297207
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive