arXiv (All)
open access
The Evidence Anchoring Boundary: Where Visual Interventions Matter and When They Help in Multimodal LLMs
Visual interventions provide a training-free way to reduce hallucinations in multimodal large language models. However, an intervention may have little leverage at some layers and may damage a correct answer even when it changes the output. We investigate where visual interventions retain leverage a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reducing Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models through Hard Grounding Preference Supervision#1116282
- Beyond Language Priors: Diagnosing and Fixing Visual-Origin Hallucinations in Multimodal LLM#819691
- Beyond Language Priors: Diagnosing and Fixing Visual-Origin Hallucinations in Multimodal LLM#809695
- ReWEIGH the Evidence: Calibrating Token-Level Ordinal Visual Evidence to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models#467162
- Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluations#1082919
Record · ID 1297333
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive