arXiv (All)
open access
Does Learning Recurrent Networks Matter in Partially Observable RL?
Reinforcement learning (RL) under partial observability typically re- lies on recurrent networks to encode temporal information, with the recurrent module trained jointly with the policy or value function. This raises a natural question: is learning the recurrent network actually necessary? In this
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ReFlow: Replay-Driven Decoupling for Efficient RL Post-Training#1357295
- ReFlow: Replay-Driven Decoupling for Efficient RL Post-Training#1348821
- Characterizing Replay Retention Under Dynamics Shift in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning#1011862
- From Causal Graphs to Markovian States: Multi-Order State Exposure for Deep RL#1354900
- Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Stable Temporal Abstraction for Language Model Agents#1201486
Record · ID 1297549
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive