arXiv (All)
open access
How Reliable are AMR Parser Outputs? Uncertainty Estimation for AMR Parsing
Recent advances have significantly improved the performance of Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) parsers, yet determining when their outputs can be trusted remains largely unexplored. This work presents the first study of uncertainty estimation for AMR parsers in a black-box setting using top-k
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SpanUQ: Span-Level Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Model Generation#1142737
- Embedding Perturbation may Better Reflect Intermediate-Step Uncertainty in LLM Reasoning#1131455
- Lost in Reordering: Structural Sensitivity of Multilingual LLMs under Semantics-Preserving Perturbations#926425
- ChainUQ: Reasoning Consistency-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models#1061965
- Imag-Eval: a language-grounded framework for interpretable Text-to-Image instruction following evaluation#794023
Record · ID 1297588
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive