eScholarship
metadata only
“Missed” Mild Cognitive Impairment: High False-Negative Error Rate Based on Conventional Diagnostic Criteria
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is typically diagnosed using subjective complaints, screening measures, clinical judgment, and a single memory score. Our prior work has shown that this method is highly susceptible to false-positive diagnostic errors. We examined whether the criteria also lead to "fa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study of a Self-Administered Memory Screening Test With Automated Reporting (SAMSTAR) in Participants With Mild Cognitive Impairment#1046572
- Memory-Based Learning Disabilities: A Syndrome Without a Pigeonhole. Towards a Mechanism-Based Diagnostic Framework.#1221489
- Default-filled outcome labels in a deployed cognitive-screening programme: an operator-level audit and the construction of twenty-four language-model arms#1149590
- Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults#1311395
- Life's Essential 8, genetic susceptibility, and risk of cognitive impairment: results from an elder population-based cohort study.#209324
Record · ID 1298552
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive