ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pursestring Wound Closure vs "Gunsight" Skin Incision and Closure Technique to Reverse Stoma
The use of temporary stomas has been demonstrated to reduce septic complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis; therefore, it is necessary to reduce the number of complications secondary to ostomy takedowns, namely wound infection. The aim of this study is to compare the rates of superficial wound infection, healing time and patient satisfaction after pursestring closure vs "gunsight" skin incision and closure technique closure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients#917894
- Efficacy Study to Evaluate Laparoscopic Fascial Closure Device#888569
- Safety and Efficacy of realSKIN® to Provide Complete Wound Closure of Burn Wounds as an Alternative to Autografting#800976
- Comparison Study in Different Sutures Techniques in Reduction of Known Abdominoplasty Complications and Improving Patients' Post-operative Outcomes#866332
- Effects by Omission of Bandage Over Exit Site#1306941
Record · ID 1306799
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive