ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Electronic Calipers to Conventional Calipers and X-ray Measurement of Spinal Tilt
The objective is to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements taken with electronic calipers and conventional calipers. Using both calipers, reproducibility will be determined by comparing results from a number of practitioners and accuracy will be determined by comparing results with those obtained from X-rays.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Interexaminer Reliability, Outcomes for Manipulation of Cervical Dysfunction, 3-D Kinematics#908769
- Investigating the Effects of Image Scaling Techniques in Radiographic Measurements of Spinal Alignment and Motion: A Comparative Analysis.#258198
- Assessment of patient radiation dose in conventional lumbar spine radiography: A multicenter study in the Souss Massa region, Morocco#133111
- Conventional Alignment System Versus Surgical Navigation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty#1113798
- A Study to Evaluate Spine Motion in Older Adults#883799
Record · ID 1306815
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive