ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years old, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group one received Articaine 4% with 1:00.000 Adrenalines. Group two received Prilocaine with 3% Felypressin (0.03 I.U. per ml). Onset time of anaesthesia was objectively evaluated by using electronic pulp testing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Infiltration Anesthesia vs. Block Anesthesia#898584
- Kovanaze Vs. Articaine in Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia of Maxillary Teeth - General#1101204
- Nebulized Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination in Sedation of Preschoolers Undergoing Dental Treatment#325204
- Articaine 4% Efficacy and Safety in Extraction and Pulpotomy of Primary Molars of Children Below the Age of Four Years#1088754
- Anesthetic Efficacy of Liposomal Prilocaine in Maxillary Infiltration Anesthesia#851527
Record · ID 1306901
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive