ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the New Endovenous Procedures Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins Due to Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence
Through a prospective RCT evaluate and compare the three new endovenous methods for great saphenous vein ablation (Radiofrequency, endovenous laser and foam sclerotherapy) versus high ligation and stripping. Procedure (proof-of-concept) and patient related (clinical outcome) factors will be studied.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effectiveness of treatments of varicose veins: systematic review and evidence synthesis#474079
- Endovenous RFA Versus Ligation and Striping for Varicose Veins#845060
- Safety and Efficacy Study of Endovenous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Varicose Veins#1100605
- Relations between previous great saphenous vein's diameter and total occlusion post sclerotherapy#935742
- Effectiveness of Treatments for Cirrhosis With Varicose Veins#184721
Record · ID 1307325
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive