ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy of Lasers, Propolis-Based Agent, and Sham for Dentine Hypersensitivity
Dentine hypersensitivity is a common clinical problem. Although Nd:YAG lasers, diode lasers, and topical desensitizing agents are widely utilized, long-term comparative evidence regarding their clinical efficacy remains limited. This prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, evaluator-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluated and compared the 12-month clinical performance of an Nd:YAG laser, a diode laser, a herbal propolis-based dentin barrier agent, and a sham application.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Diode Laser Therapy As An Adjunct To Scaling And Root Planing#1085764
- A Clinical Trial to Compare Lasotronix Alone or in Combination With CPP-ACP to Treat DH#1229552
- Evaluating Laser and Piezocision vs. Piezocision Alone on Root Resorption and Gingival Health During Tooth Retraction#842958
- Effects of Scaling and Root Planing With and Without Er:YAG Laser in Chronic Periodontitis Patients#827122
- Efficacy of 810 nm Diode Laser Disinfection on Inflammatory Cytokines and Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Retreatment#125895
Record · ID 1307393
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive