ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pilonidal Excision Versus Endoscopic Surgery
Compare clinical outcomes of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) with excision treatment with a randomised clinical trial.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Study Between Wide Local Excision and Minimal Excision of Pilonidal Sinus#1074840
- Ghnnam Excision Technique for Pilonidal Sinus#877070
- Excision and Reconstruction of the Natal Cleft With a Parasacral Perforator Flap Versus Open Excision With Secondary Healing, in the Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease.#869177
- De-roofing and Curettage vs WLE for Pilonidal Abscess#896878
- Open Wide Excision Versus Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease#1320862
Record · ID 1308079
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive